The Internet
TESL Journal
Co-teaching As a Possibility for Differentiated Instruction
Cecilia W. L. Chu
cchu2006 [=at=] gmail.com
Hong Kong Baptist University, (Hong Kong, China)
Background
In recent years, some progressive schools in Hong Kong and in some
Asian countries have taken a flexible approach to timetabling and class
structuring, aiming at creating more space for teachers and students.
One curriculum initiative is the integration of co-teaching and split
class teaching in a subject. A common practice is ‘grazing’
(Vaughn et al , 1997): that is when two teachers are present in the
classroom, one stands at the front of the room providing explanation or
instruction, and one ‘drifts’ around assisting students or checking to
see if they are paying attention or following the lesson. However, as
all the steps of the lesson can be managed equally well by one teacher,
co-teaching is reduced to whole-class teaching being shared between two
teachers, resulting in a duplication of effort and a waste of human
resources. In view of some misunderstandings seen in the conduct of
co-teaching in some language teaching classrooms, I try to review the
principles of co-teaching and discuss how they can be practised in
schools to the realization of differentiated instruction in English
language teaching.
What is Co-teaching?
According to Bauwens et al (1989), co-teaching is understood as the
simultaneous presence of the general education and special education
workers, who jointly teach academically and behaviourally heterogeneous
groups of students in educationally integrated settings. Now,
co-teaching is a teaching approach adopted in a wide range of
classrooms. ‘Leave no child behind’ remains the leading principle of
co-teaching from the past decade. So, the first aim of co-teaching is
to cater for learner diversity in class.
Another aim of co-teaching is to enhance the quality of teaching. Added
teaching power should be directed at providing positive synergy to
enhance student learning. Co-teaching can be understood as co-planning
and co-teaching realised in a differentiated package of instruction as
below:
- Teachers in a co-teaching pair/team plan a scheme of work, which
is aimed at the average student.
- Teachers then introduce changes to the plan in response to the
different needs, abilities, interests, learning styles etc. of students.
- Teachers choose a mode of co-teaching to implement on the basis
of their own expertise.
It should be remembered that co-teaching is meant to serve a
differentiated curriculum/ kind of instruction and, therefore, planning
should start from the perspective of the learner rather than from what
the teacher can offer at the start of the planning stage. The steps of
co-planning and co-teaching should not be reversed.
What Are Some Modes of Co-teaching?
Co-teaching can take many patterns. Which three of the following
scenarios do you think are typical co-teaching designs that cater for
the different needs and interests of students?
- Both teachers work with their own groups in a
class and they teach, re-teach, supplement and instruct their own
students until the two groups are ready to rejoin later for some core
tasks.
- Both teachers divide the content and skills to be
taught. Students rotate through ‘stations’ managed by the teachers.
Eventually all students participate in all ‘stations.’ This is more
suitable for classrooms with ‘learning centres- e.g. storytelling
corner, writing corner.’
- One provides core content, one provides
supplementary instruction to the less able students or to the remedial
class.
- Split the instructional tasks, with each teacher
taking responsibility for specific groups of students, e.g. for
variation of tasks.
- Both jointly plan instruction, each delivers it to
half of the class.
Co-teaching partners should not simply divide the work between each
other and just teach their own part of the lesson(s) as in mode 5.
Neither should teachers be reduced to a minor role as an assistant, as
in mode 3, simply explaining the content again to some students. Mode 3
can be a reasonable co-teaching design if it is modified in this way :
One teacher presents material, one presents strategies; one takes turns
leading discussion, one demonstrates concepts/strategies. The
assignment of duties depends on the special knowledge and skills of
different teachers. They should make sure that their roles are
complementary, not supplementary. Their particular expertise can be a
deciding factor for co-teaching when variation of core tasks is
required to cater to different levels of student ability and interest.
Thus, mode 4 is an appropriate pattern of co-teaching in this case. I
will discuss the other modes in the next section.
Conditions and Resources Necessary in Schools
For one plus one (1 +1) to become two plus (2+, 3+,…), and not just two
(2) when practising co-teaching (i.e. co-planning cum co-teaching),
schools need to provide the necessary supporting conditions.
Supportive measures should be in place to create space for
teachers. It is necessary to schedule co-teaching and separate
time slots for co-teaching staff to carry out other instructional
activities. For example, a secondary school allows three co-teaching
lessons per week for some secondary classes.
With such a provision, there are three lessons open for two English
language teachers to plan and implement co-teaching. An instructional
unit may be devised as follows: The class is split into two teams based
on students' interests and needs in a story performing task. Both teams
work on a story of their choice, practise skills and rehearse in
separate venues but at the same time for a week under the support of
two teachers. Then they merge later to have core story performing
activity - with the two teachers as adjudicators and a large number of
students as audience for the two teams of performers. This sort of
co-teaching is an example of mode 1.
The same story-performing task may take mode 2 of co-teaching patterns,
if one teacher has drama training background and another is good at
story writing. Half of the class may then spend time with one teacher
at the drama skills station and then shift to the story writing station
to get the help of another teacher to analyse the story characters. In
this way, both teachers can make best use of their own special skills
with a small group and students will get sufficient attention at each
work station. These two examples illustrate the diversity and
flexibility which can be realised in holistic curriculum planning to
enhance teaching and learning.
Professional Development
Co-teaching collaboration is sometimes described an "arranged marriage"
(Finley, 2005). An imposed pairing-up for co-teaching will lock
teachers into a superficial approach to shared planning and teaching if
they are not well-informed about the concepts and techniques of the new
teaching approach. School management can arrange more professional
development programmes for teachers, and organise inter-school sharing
and interflow of experiences on similar topics.
Final Remarks
In many classrooms, co-teaching partnerships have
been characterised by collaboration between content subject teachers
and special educators in monitoring duties within the classroom. When
the world is getting smaller, and collaborative teaching culture is
more common in schools, co-teaching is likely to become more important
in a wider range of teaching contexts. I hope to see that one plus one
results in three, four and five, and the students learn better from the
strategic planning and flexible implementation of co-teaching.
Reference
- Bauwens, J., Hourcade, J. J., & Friend, M. (1989).
Cooperative teaching: A Model for General and Special Education
Integration. Remedial and Special Education, 10(2), pp. 17- 22.
- Finley, B. (2005). School Lane Implements Co-teaching.
Bucks County Courier Times. Retrieved from http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/111-09012005-535306.html
- on 21 April 2006
- Vaughn, S., Schumm, J.S., & Arguelles, M.E.(1997).The
ABCDEs of Co-Teaching. The Council for Exceptional Children. Teaching
Exceptional Children, Vol. 30, No. 2 pp.4-10
The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. XII, No. 11, November 2006
http://iteslj.org/
http://iteslj.org/Articles/Chu-Co-teaching.html