The Internet
TESLJournal
TESOL Teachers as International Managers
Scott A. Hipsher
Bangkok University (Bangkok, Thailand)
scotta[at]loxinfo.co.th
TESOL teacher and international managers face similar challenges. Some
of the common principles in the international management literature are
examined and suggestions on how these principles can be used by TESOL
teachers are
made.
International Business Research
While no one is likely to confuse the pay packages and stock options of
expatriate and international managers of multinational companies with
the compensation received by English teachers working in foreign
countries, the two groups do share some similarities. Both
international managers and English teachers operate in multicultural
environments. Both of their duties include planning for, leading,
organizing, and controlling individuals (e.g. employees and students)
from cultures other than their own to achieve organizational and
individual objectives. Furthermore, both groups will be required to
operate in organizational cultures based on different underlying
assumptions than one has grown used to. Both teachers and managers
operating in multicultural environments will also need to enlist
cooperation from individuals from different cultural backgrounds that
they have no direct authority over (e.g., co-workers, bosses, and
business partners). Taking a closer look at some of the principles and
issues in international management may provide a fresh perspective for
teachers that they can use to improve their performance in the
classroom as well as to more fully enjoy the international lifestyle
that attracted so many TESOL teachers to the profession in the first
place.
Clash of Cultures
Many of the problems teachers have the most trouble handling are
cultural in nature. Whether one is reading the online forums for
English teachers, overhearing conversations in staff rooms of
international language schools, or spending an evening out with one's
teaching colleagues, the same topics creep up over and over again. One
of these topics is about the students. In some countries one might hear
how the students are lazy and never come to class on time, while in
others a more common complaint might be how the students lack
imagination and are only able to memorize grammar rules. The lack of
management skills of the local managers of the schools is also a common
theme of conversations of English teachers around the world.
Apparently, it is not the technical aspects of teaching English, (e.g.,
preparing lesson plans, modeling the target language, or understanding
specific grammar points) that cause teachers the most difficulties; it
is dealing with intercultural working relationships. While these days,
most international managers receive substantial cultural training
before embarking on duties in a multicultural environment, TESOL
teachers normally receive virtually none.
Culture in and out of the Classroom
"Culture is a set of beliefs and values about what is desirable in a
community of people and a set of formal or informal practices to
support the values" (Javidan & House: 292). Furthermore, it
has also been suggested that culture exists on a multitude of levels
and dimensions in which nationality is only one. (Griffith, Hu, &
Ryans, 2000: 303; Slater, Boone, Price, & Martinez, 2002:198).
Furthermore, people are affected by regional, organizational, family,
and work group cultures in addition to national culture, and there are
not always clear boundaries where the influence of one culture ends and
another begins.
Teachers can teach vocabulary definitions and grammar rules to
students, but until the students gain a "feel" for the language and can
use the language naturally, the students will not have mastered
English. The same principle applies to teachers working in
multicultural environments. The teachers can learn the basic dos and
don'ts of working within a multicultural environment, but until the
teacher gains a feel for how to act in specific situations and can
interact in the environment in a natural manner, unnecessary conflict
and confusion will persist.
While it is important to have some level of understanding of the
cultures of the individuals one is working with, the first step in
gaining a real feel for working internationally is to understand one’'s
own culture. Individuals are often keenly aware of how culture affects
the behavior of those of another culture while not being aware of how
their own behavior is also culturally oriented (Javidan & House,
2001: 291, Hofstede, 1983: 77; McBurney and White, 2004: 5).
Teacher Expectations
Many of the native English-speaking teacher's expectations of students
and management are culturally based and can be explained by using
Hofstede's (1980, 1983) framework. Western teachers from nations with
high masculinity scores often expect students to place a high emphasis
on success and are disappointed and often angered by students from
cultures with lower masculinity scores who don't place the same value
on successfully mastering the subject. Other western teachers may get
frustrated over the perceived lack of imagination and creativity of
their students without realizing the differences in uncertainty
avoidance between cultures may be at the heart of this reluctance to
stand out from the crowd. Lack of understanding of underlying
assumptions regarding power-distance is often at the center of
difficulties between foreign native English speaking teachers and local
managers in schools around the world. In fact, there are significant
differences in underlying cultural assumptions and principles governing
the behavior of managers in different parts of the globe and
misunderstandings between managers and workers from different cultures
don’t only happen in educational institutions (Chong & Thomas,
1997; Javidan & Carl, 2005; Kanungo & Wright: 1983;
Neelankavil, Mathur, & Zhang, 2000; Suutari, Raharjo, &
Riikkila, 2002; Zagorsek, Jaklic, & Stough, 2004). Additionally,
the differences in individualism and collectivism of cultures can be
especially problematic for all native English speaking international
teachers, and especially so for Americans, working abroad. "The extreme
position of the United States on the Individualism scale leads to other
potential conflicts between the U.S. way of thinking about
organizations and the values dominant in other parts of the world"
(Hofstede, 1980: 61).
However, when attempting to gain an understanding of cultural
differences one needs to be careful not to drift into stereotyping.
People are generally more aware of the variations within one's own
culture than in others. However, teachers should remember there are
great variations in individuals in every culture. There is no more a
single Japanese or Portuguese way of teaching or managing than there
are single British or Canadian ways of teaching or managing.
The Reality of Globalization
It is near impossible these days to read a magazine, academic journal,
or watch the news on TV without being exposed to the notion that the
world is coming closer together through globalization and national and
regional differences are diminishing. For example, Kienle and Loyd
(2005: 580) claim globalization is becoming "more prominent in all
aspects of civilization." But the notion that the world is becoming
more and more alike is not at all new, "National differences and
antagonism between people are daily more and more vanishing" was a
statement in one of history's most influential works written over 150
years ago (Marx & Engels, 2004/1848: 2). Is globalization really
eliminating the cultural differences around the world or is the
following true: "Globalization is often more a slogan and wishful
thinking than a reality" (Hofstede, et al. p. 800).
If one looks beyond the surface, many differences remain between
geographical regions. London and Hart (2004) and Ricart, et al. (2004)
make the claim that the vast majority of the world's population lives
in extreme poverty and outside anyone’s definition of the global
economy. Many others have also looked at the data and questioned the
extent and impact of "globalization" (Chortareas & Pelagidis, 2004;
Ghemawat, 2003; Leduc, 2005; O'Neil, 2004). While it is true that there
are more intercultural contacts between individuals today than in the
past, both the extent and impact of "globalization" needs to be kept in
perspective. "The increasing connection between countries does not mean
that cultural differences are disappearing or diminishing" (Javidan
& House, 2001: 292).
Moving Beyond the Global View to the Worldly View
Gosling and Mintzberg (2003, p. 58) encourage managers working
internationally to move beyond having a global view to having a
"worldly" view. The global view looks for generalities while the
worldly view stresses "attention paid to particular responses to
specific conditions." The worldly view takes into account the need for
international managers to "add social as well as economic value."
Furthermore, Gosling & Mintzberg believe one should not only see
the surface differences but to realize when "landing in different
places, we join a plurality of worldviews." Also, the global view
assumes the "world is converging toward a common culture" while the
authors find "this is a world made up of edges and boundaries, like a
patchwork."
Practical Applications for Teachers
Since international managers and TESOL teachers have much in common,
adopting Gosling and Mintzberg's (2003) worldly view may have practical
applications for teachers. The point about moving beyond generalization
to paying attention to context, warns teachers about the overuse of
standardized teaching material and methods. The vast majority of both
educational and leadership theory is based on research conducted by
Anglo-American researchers using frameworks developed in western
contexts (Slater, et al. 2002). Teaching techniques learned in a
teacher training course and standardized textbooks may be a good
starting point for lessons, but one should not feel the need the follow
either to the letter. Teachers working abroad with a majority of
students coming from a single culture should often adjust the lessons
to meet the local needs while teachers working in more multi-cultural
environments may want to employ a variety of teaching techniques and
material based on different educational theories.
Most adult students want to learn English for economic reasons and
government schools primarily promote the learning of English also for
economic purposes. Teaching English in order for both individuals and
society to grow economically is adding social value to the societies
teachers are working in. There are other ways English teachers can add
social value, one of these is by generating new ideas and understanding
through intercultural interactions. Most teachers feel enriched by the
inter-cultural interactions that have experienced; the same applies for
the students and co-workers the teachers come into contact with.
However, one needs to be careful to not use the classroom as a way of
promoting specific cultural or political viewpoints. A TESOL teacher's
primary job is to teach English, it is not to stand on a soapbox for
the entire class period and promote values based on the teacher's
cultural or individual ideology. Understanding one's own cultural
values will help teachers in promoting universal values rather than
culturally specific values.
Everyone has a unique worldview based on their own individual
personality and cultural background. Understanding that others have
different world viewpoints can lessen the misunderstandings between
native English speaking teachers and students and others who the
teachers must deal with professionally. Working internationally or in a
multicultural environment does not require one to abandon one's core
values, but to be successful, one needs to suppress the urge to impose
those values on others. With a little tolerance and patience, cultural
differences will appear not to be something that should be eliminated,
but to be celebrated.
Implementation of the Worldly View
Like all suggestions, adapting the worldly view is easier to propose
than to implement. It requires a great deal of self-reflection about
one's own attitudes and behavior. The key point of the acquiring the
worldly view is to understand oneself and one's own culture. Studying a
foreign language is an invaluable method for an English teacher to gain
a better understanding of the English language and to see the language
from the perspective of the students. The same principle applies to
learning one's own culture. Studying foreign cultures, living abroad,
studying foreign languages, and getting oneself off the tourist trail
can help to develop a worldly view, but only if one keeps an open mind.
It is impossible for a teacher or an international manager to become an
expert in the culture of every individual one will have to deal with
professionally, but understanding one's own culture can help one in a
variety of multicultural situations.
Developing a worldly viewpoint requires effort and an open mind, but
there are substantial professional and personal rewards for the teacher
willing to make the effort.
References
- Chong, L.M.A., & Thomas, D.C. (1997). Leadership perceptions
in cross-cultural context: Pakeha and Pacific Islanders in New Zealand.
Leadership Quarterly. 8 (3), 275-293.
- Chortareas, G.E. & Pelagidis, T. (2004). Trade flows: A facet
of regionalism or globalization? Cambridge Journal of Economics 28 (2),
253-271.
- Ghemawat, P. (2003). Semiglobalization and international business
strategy. Journal of International Business Studies. 34 (2),
138-152.
- Gosling, J. & Mintzberg, H. (2003). The five minds of a
manager. Harvard Business Review. 81 (11), 54-64.
- Griffith, D.A, Hu, M.Y. & Ryans, J.K. Jr. (2000). Process
standardization across intra- and inter-cultural relationships. Journal
of International Business Studies. 31 (2) 303-324.
- Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do
American theories apply abroad. Organizational Dynamics, 9 (1), 42-63.
- Hofstede, G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational
practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies. 14
(1), 75-89.
- Hofstede, G., Van Deusen, C.A., Mueller, C.B., Charles, T.A. and
the Business Goals Network (2002). What goals do business leaders
pursue? A study of fifteen countries. Journal of International Business
Studies. 33 (4), 785-803.
- Javidan, M. & Carl, D.E. (2005). Leadership across cultures:
A study of Canadian and Taiwanese Executives. Management International
Review. 45 (1), 23-44.
- Javidan, M. & House, R.J. (2001). Cultural acumen for the
global manager: Lessons from Project Globe. Organizational Dynamics. 29
(4), 289-305.
- Kanungo, R.N. & Wright, R.W. (1983). A cross-cultural
comparative study of managerial job attitudes. Journal of International
Business Studies. 14, (000002), 115-129.
- Kienle, A.W. & Loyd, N.L. (2005). Globalization and the
emergence of supranational organizations: Implications for graduate
programs in higher education administration. College Student Journal.
39 (3), 580-87.
- Leduc, S. (2005), "International risk-sharing: Globalization is
weaker than you think", Business Review - Federal Reserve Bank of
Philadelphia. Second Quarter 2005, 18-25.
- London, T. & Hart, S.T. (2004). Perspective: Reinventing
strategies for emerging markets: Beyond the transnational model.
Journal of International Business Studies. 35 (5), 350–370.
- Marx and Engels (2004/1848, p.2; p 18), "The Communist
Manifesto", Marxist Internet Archive retrieved November 10, 2005 from
www.marxist.org/http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/index.htm.
- McBurney, D.H. & White, T.L. (2004). Research Methods (6th
ed). Thomson-Wadsworth, Belmont, ca. ISBN. 0-534-52418-4.
- O' Neil, T. (2004). Globalization: Fads, fiction and facts.
Business Economics. 39 (1), 16-27.
- Neelankavil, J.P., Mathur, A., & Zhang, Y. (2000).
Determinants of managerial performance: A cross-cultural comparison of
the perceptions of middle-level managers in four countries. Journal of
International Business Studies. 31 (1), 121-140.
- Ricart, J.E., Enright, M.J., Ghemawat,, P., Hart, S.L.
& Khanna, T. (2004). Perspective: New frontiers in
international strategy. Journal of International Business Studies. 35
(3), 175–200.
- Slater, C.L., Boone, M., Price, L. & Martinez, D. (2002). A
cross-cultural investigation of leadership in the United States and
Mexico. School Leadership & Management. 22 (2), 197-209.
- Suutari, V., Raharjo, K., & Riikkila, T. (2002). The
challenge of cross-cultural leadership interaction: Finnish expatriates
in Indonesia. Career Development International. 7 (6/7), 415-429.
- Zagorsek, H., Jaklic, M., & Stough, S.J. (2004). Comparing
Leadership Practices Between the United States, Nigeria, and Slovenia:
Does culture matter? Cross Cultural Management.11 (2), 16-34.
The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. XII, No. 3, March 2006
http://iteslj.org/
http://iteslj.org/Articles/Hipsher-InternationalManagers.html