The Internet TESL
Journal
Teaching ESL/EFL Students to Recognize Gender Bias in Children's
Literature
Junmin Kuo
jukuo[at]indiana.edu
Indiana University (Bloomington, Indiana, USA)
Introduction
Children's literature, in addition to being one of the favorite choices
for reading among students as they are growing up, is commonly used in
the context of
reading practices in ESL/EFL classrooms (Lazar, 1993). A great
number of teachers tend to employ picture books, chapter books, and
fairy tales because they think these teaching materials can help
students build a repertoire of narratives and create a world of their
own while improving their literacy. However, many researchers
point out that gender bias is still prevalent in contemporary
children's and young adult literature and continues to fuel hot debate
(Christensen, 2001; Evans, 1998; Garner, 1994; Louie, 2001). As a
result, Mem Fox(1993) argues that teachers need to be sensitive to
their teaching
materials or they will easily fall into "a passive acceptance of
everything literature presents to us" (p. 86).
The purpose of the paper is to provide a review of children's
literature in view of gender stereotypes, which will help teachers
better understand the
issue and problem of stereotyped female roles in their teaching
sources. What follows
are suggestions that teachers can consider as their teaching principles
or strategies to be implemented in the context or reading practices in
ESL/EFL classrooms. It is hoped that the discussion of such a
controversial issue can stimulate teachers to rethink what and how they
should teach in the 21st century classroom. Ultimately, the topic
of gender issues can help students foster critical thinking and
literacy and empower them with a further understanding of gender
notions in their lives.
Literature Review
Studies on gender stereotypes in children's literature appeared as a
consequence of the women's movement in the early 1970s (Louie,
2001). At that
juncture, even a number of books awarded with Newberry Award or
Caldecott Award Honors were still
replete with traditional and passive female roles (Feminists on
Children's
Literature, 1971; Women on Words and Images, 1975). These
children's books, investigated
from feminist perspectives, fall into two categories. The first
category is sexist books, in
which female characters are largely recognized and accepted through
"their domestic accomplishments, their timidity of soul, [and] their
gentle appearance and manners" (20). The second category is
comprised of "cop-out" books which implicitly express gender biases
only by a crucial line, a paragraph, or the last chapter.
It should be noted that many of these books are still popular and
commonly used in the contemporary classroom. More importantly,
after three decades of
research studies since the 1970s, such an insensitive mentality toward
sexual imbalance is still
present in contemporary children's literature (Ernst, 1995; Evans,
1998; Fox, 1993; Louie,
2001; Tepper & Cassidy, 1999). Under such circumstances, a
great many writers have become
more aware of the gender issues in their books. For example, Mem
Fox (1993)
attempts to increase the number of female characters in her books, and
points out that many of
her books are intentionally "dominated by main characters who are
either girls,
female animals, or dynamic elderly women" (85). However, Ernst
(1995) explicitly indicates
that the purposeful treatment and balance of female/male characters in
a story, while
admirable, are not a realistic standard for all children's literature,
and in fact, is impossible to maintain given to the volume and variety
of books in the trade book market every year. Nevertheless, she
suggests that books like Fox's can be used and considered in the
classroom to offer teachers different perspectives on gender issues and
help them enrich their reading materials and discussions. From
Ernst's viewpoint, it would be more realistic and especially important
to come up with "more books with strong female characters who are
active, inventive, and in charge of their own destinies" (p. 75), thus
placing more emphsis on the quality of female roles.
The persistent imbalance of gender representation in children's
literature highlights the importance of children's literature in
greatly shaping many children's
minds and consistently influencing different cultures in the
world. For example,
numerous children in many countries grow up exposed to American
culture, which, to many children, is mostly composed of various fairy
tales, such as Snow White, Cinderella, The Little Mermaid, and Sleeping
Beauty, none of which is American in ultimate origin
(Christensen,
2001). These fairy tales are also the main source of the animated
movies that have been present in our lives for so many decades.
Therefore, if we accept that fairy tales are one of the major
categories in children's literature, we will agree that children's
literature is probably the most influential genre read among students
of different levels. Children's literature has become part of our
culture that frames, or even dictates, the consciousness of our
children and young people because they hear the stories and watch the
movies again and again. In sum, children and young people receive
a “secret education” (Dorfman, 1983, Prefact ix), in which children's
literature
and popular culture share power in society and work to undermine the
possibilities for greater democracy and equality in the classroom.
The stereotypes and worldview embedded in children's books have become
accepted knowledge, and such deep-seated socialized thinking has
created
barriers that prevent authors or teachers from implementing their
democratic and egalitarian beliefs, whether it be writing or
teaching. According to Louie (2001), coping with relentless
gender stereotyping requires increasing awareness of gender issues on
the part of authors and teachers. Authors should devote their
attention to the representation of female and male roles in their
writing process, while teachers should attempt to empower their
students with critical thinking and alternative reading. What
follows in the next section are some instructional principles or
strategies that teachers can incorporate into their classroom teaching.
Coping with Gender Biases in Reading
Dominant Reading Practices
In a democratic and anti-bias classroom, teachers need to be extremely
aware of the fact that dominant reading practices will make students
accustomed to
mainstream texts and as a result students will passively identify
themselves with the
characters in many stories. As Moon (1999) indicates,
female protagonists in such stories
have merely become the obstacles or prizes which the male characters
encounter in the
narratives. While men are always elevated as the characters who
matter, women are reduced to
being tokens of male status. Teachers should help students
develop critical thinking through learning processes such as reading
against the grain, in which teachers equip students with a certain
stance that deliberately challenges the text and helps students uncover
the gender
inequalities present in the text. In brief, teachers should adopt
resistant or
oppositional reading practices rather than dominant or conventional
reading practices.
Resistant Reading Practices
To implement the notion of resistant reading practices, teachers should
encourage students to approach a text critically by making sense of the
text
without applying traditional gender concepts. One useful strategy
is to read and discuss the text through feminist perspectives that are
based on women's positions in patriarchal society and discourse.
Three of these relevant perspectives are:
- the history of subordination and marginalization of women (women
as the second sex);
- women's absence from mainstream discourse; and
- the objectification of women, which usually places women in one
of the following four positions/categories:
- nurturing mothers/caregivers
- dutiful daughters
- sexual/passionate women
- mad/bad women
These four categories represent different female positions in Western
cultures (Moon, 1999, p. 58). The first two categories are
symbolic of legitimate
positions in a male dominated society. The third position can be
a projection of male desire or need, while the last status is a
nonconforming position. In most cases, these different female
roles are defined according to what men want from them. Often in
the course of a story female roles move from one category to another,
or they can portray different identities simultaneously— such as being
a dutiful daughter and a passionate girl (e.g. Cinderella).
Through the conceptual perspectives mentioned above, teachers can
stimulate students to analyze different books and construct new
meanings out of them.
Example
Examples of female stereotyped representations can be seen in the fairy
tales of Snow White, Rapunzel, Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, and The
Little
Mermaid. While using these texts in the classroom, a
teacher can
implement the following
activities in an attempt to develop students' critical thinking and
help them become alert to
gender issues through resistant reading practices:
Before Reading
- Have students write the beginning of an original children's book
and read it to the class.
- Raise the issue of gender bias/fairness by examining how many
students have chosen to make their main character male/female.
- Provide students with the four categories of female stereotyped
characters mentioned above.
During Reading
- Ask students to pay attention while reading the text to the
transition of the female role in relation to these four categories.
-
After Reading
- Divide students into groups and have them identify into which
categories the female characters fall.
- Have students locate to which of the four categories the
counter-female roles belong if there are counter-female roles in the
story (such as stepmothers, stepsisters, or witches).
- Invite students to participate in critical conversations by
offering controversial questions:
- Do the
women in the text represent obstacles or prizes? How?
- Would this text normally be read as supporting or challenging
the patriarchal oppression of women?
- How would changing the gender of the main character impact
the story?
- Encourage students to compare and contrast their ideas through
charts, webs, and Venn diagrams.
- Have students evaluate and assess their understanding of gender
issues by comparing their chart/web/diagram with their personal
experiences.
Conclusion
As Short (2001) observes, teaching resembles a political agenda.
There are no such things as politically innocent books for
students. Moreover, it
should be noted that a classroom is always laden with different values
and perspectives
introduced by teachers, students, and the texts. On entering a
classroom and beginning a
discussion, we have no choice but to become political. Teachers
should empower students
with critical thinking by utilizing resistant or oppositional reading
practices. Teachers
and students should claim their own stances, and their values and ideas
should then be
investigated and challenged. As a result, when students
access any text that is problematically gender-biased, teachers can
help them make better sense of the text by approaching the text from
multiple perspectives and with alternative attitudes.
References
- Bigelow, B. et al. (Eds.) (2001). Rethinking Our Classroom:
Teaching
for Equality and Justice. Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
- Christensen, L. (2001). Unlearning the Myths That Bind Us:
Critiquing
Fairy Tales and Films. In B. Bigelow et al (Eds.), Rethinking
Our Classroom: Teaching for Equality and Justice (pp. 8-11). Milwaukee,
WI:
Rethinking Schools.
- Dorfman, A. (1983). The Empire's Old Clothes: What the Lone
Ranger,
Babar, and Other Innocent Heroes Do to Our Minds. New York:
Pantheon Books.
- Ernst. S. B. (1995). Gender Issues in Books for Children and
Young
Adults. In S. Lehr (Ed.), Battling Dragons, Issues and Controversy in
Children's Literature. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
- Evans, J. (1998) ‘Princesses are not into war ‘n things, they
always
scream and run off': Exploring gender stereotypes in picture books.
Reading, 32(3), 5-11.
- Feminist on Children's Literature. (1971). A Feminist Look at
Children's Books. School Library Journal, 18, 19-24.
- Fox, M. (1993). Men Who Weep, Boys Who Dance: The Gender Agenda
Between
the Lines in Children's Literature. Language Arts, 70,
84-88.
- Garner, J. F. (1994). Politically Correct Bedtime Stories: Modern
Tales
for Our Life & Times. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
- Hearne, B. & w/Stevenson, D. (1999). Choosing Books for
Children: A
Commonsense Guide (3rd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois
Press.
- Lazar, Gillian. Literature and Language Teaching: A guide for
teachers
and trainers. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Lehr, S. (Ed.) (1995). Battling Dragons, Issues and Controversy
in
Children's Literature. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
- Lehr, S. (Ed.) (2001), Beauty, Brains, and Brawn: The
Construction of
Gender in Children's Literature. Portsmouth, NH:
Heinemann.
- Louie, B. Y. (2001). Why Gender Stereotypes Still Persist in
Contemporary Children's Literature. In S. Lehr (Ed.), Beauty, Brains,
and Brawn: The Construction of Gender in Children's Literature.
Portsmouth, NH:
Heinemann.
- Lukens, R. J. (1999). A Critical Handbook of Children's
Literature (6th
ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
- Moon, B. (1999). Literary Terms: A Practical Glossary. Urbana,
IL: NCTE.
- Short, K. G. (2001). Why Do Educators Need a Political Agenda on
Gender. In S. Lehr (Ed.), Beauty, Brains, and Brawn: The Construction
of
Gender in Children's Literature. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
- Tepper, C. A. & Cassidy, K. W. (1999). Gender Differences in
Emotional Language in Children's Picture Books. Sex Roles, 40 (3/4),
265-280.
- Women on Words and Images. (1972). Dick and Jane as Victims: Sex
Stereotyping in Children's Readers: An Analysis (2nd ed.).
Princeton, N.J.: Women on Words & Images.
The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. XI, No. 11, November 2005
http://iteslj.org/
http://iteslj.org/Articles/Kuo-GenderBias.html