The Internet TESL
Journal
Developing Writing Skills in a Foreign Language via the Internet
Roger C. Kenworthy
hkadvisor[at]ohio.edu
Ohio University (Hong Kong)
Introduction
There is little doubt that academic writing can be very challenging for
learners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) as they must overcome
the personal challenges associated with academic writing (generating
ideas, organization, and mechanics) in order to develop the skills
requisite for genre specific, coherent, and readable essays. With the
introduction of the personal computer into the second language-writing
classroom, and access to the Internet, both educators and learners
alike have been provided with unlimited sources of information in the
form of readable, authentic texts that address a wide variety of topics
that are essential for second language development. This text describes
a procedure whereby the collaboration of equally skilled second
language learners, along the integration of electronic technology into
the second language classroom, can aid writers in the production of
genre specific compositions.
Objectives
The purpose of this activity is to have learners write a
compare/contrast essay in collaboration with a small group of
classmates based upon information solely found within an electronic
environment. Access to the Internet allows this group of learners to
identify and collect an entire corpus of information electronically. As
a result of this partnership, learners plan, negotiate, research,
and share information in order to meet the requirements of the assigned
task.
The use of learner collaboration within the second language classroom
and the subsequent benefits for learners is well supported by a number
of experiments. These salient points have come to light from the
research; interaction between learners and the subsequent sharing of
information is compatible with the theoretical goals of the
communicative approach to writing (Fathman & Kessler, 1993);
de-emphasis of teacher-centered instruction (Long & Porter, 1985);
aids in the development of syntactical competence (Kowal and Swain,
1994); and students act as resources for each other to achieve a common
goal (McGroarty, 1989) which results in meaningful, useful, and
practical language applications that increases group members’
motivation for learning (Greenfield, 2003; Hauck &
Haezewindt, 1999).
The Internet, with the capacity to connect users throughout the world,
has also been extensively examined for its potential to aid in the
development of second language learner’s skills. Results of a number of
studies indicate that the Internet is found to contain real language in
a meaningful context (Warschaur & Healey, 1998), and as a result of
viewing this material, learners develop into creators of language
rather than passive recipients (Brown, 1991). Implementation of
technology within the second language writing classroom also promotes
learner autonomy (Graus, 1999), is an excellent means for teaching
foreign culture and language (Osuna & Meskill, 1998), and in
general, positively influences students’ attitudes which contributes to
an overall greater willingness to write (Kern, 1995).
Theoretically and pedagogically, it appears that the marriage between
collaborative writing and electronic technology is an ideal means to
help writers develop the much-needed skills to succeed at academic
writing.
Compare/Contrast Essay
The focus of this particular genre of essay helps a reader to better
understand and determine the merits of two or more subjects. In order
for our learners to clearly discuss these merits, it is important for
them to be able to write this type of essay and explain how two or more
subjects are similar and/or different. It is also important to educate
learners of the genre specific features that distinguish a
compare/contrast essay from others found within the canon of academic
writing. As a result, this section does not deal with the common
features of academic essays (topic sentences, paragraphs, conclusions),
but rather the differences, namely connectors and organization, which
set compare/contrast essays apart from other academic writings.
Within this lesson, learners are made aware that certain connectors are
primarily used for compare/contrast essays. These words for comparison
include: both, in the same way, similarly, similar to, like, likewise,
is like, have in common, just as, compared to, same as, and resembles.
While contrast is indicated by the following: however, although, but,
in contrast, unlike, different from, differs from, on the contrary,
whereas, while, and on the other hand. Various exercises, such as a
cloze, can be used to provide opportunities for learners to use these
connectors correctly before essay writing occurs.
As well, writers are informed of the methods of properly organizing a
compare/contrast essay. There are two primary methods of organization
used: chunking (divided pattern or block method) and sequencing
(alternating pattern or point by point). With two subjects in mind,
chunking separately presents all the points and details of the one
subject. Then the next section discusses and includes all the
points and details of the other subject. For example, if our writers
are asked to compare the annual weather of Hong Kong and Toronto,
Canada, they would first include the relevant details of Hong Kong’s
precipitation, temperature, and humidity. Next they would go on to
discuss specific information concerning Toronto’s precipitation,
temperature, and humidity. In contrast, sequencing discusses all the
pertinent details and supporting evidence for only one point at a time,
however, the discussion focuses upon both subjects. Referring
back to our discussion of Hong Kong’s and Toronto’s weather; the first
section would be about the yearly precipitation received in both
cities. This would be followed by a full discussion of the temperature
of both Hong Kong and Toronto, and would finally end with the complete
details of humidity readings.
Since there are different methods to organize this genre of text, it
should be explained to writers that there is no right or wrong one;
learners should use the method that is most suitable for them.
Regardless of the method used, learners should always present the
points for discussion (in the case of Hong Kong and Toronto;
precipitation, temperature, and humidity) in the same order as stated
in their thesis statement. Finally, previous experience has shown that
it is beneficial to expose learners to various examples of compare and
contrast texts in order to have them analyze the method of
organization, and the types and numbers of connectors used. Having
being acquainted with the configuration of this genre, learners can
model their own work in this area of academic writing.
The Internet
The Internet has made many opportunities available to both learners and
educators that were not feasible in the past. For example, there are
endless resources available in the form of newspapers, magazines,
government listings, grammars, dictionaries, newsgroups, key-pals, and
mailing lists just to name a few. And, at our very fingertips are
assorted, authentic materials whose access are not limited to either
temporal or spatial constraints, for the Internet is easily accessed 24
hours a day from any computer terminal throughout the world. With these
unique opportunities in mind, writers are required to only use the
material secured from the Internet to compose their essays. It is
assumed that a class previously received formal instruction which
focused upon the use of electronic technology, thus, there is no need
or space to discuss the practical tips required for successful
navigation of the Internet.
In this lesson, writers are required to locate a variety of facts about
a major world city. As already known, there are numerous sites
available to provide the necessary information to complete a writing
assignment, and even though an instructor may have personal favorites,
learners should be persuaded to personally explore and decide upon
their own chose of sites. Learners can easily access web sites by
simply using a familiar search engine (Google, Yahoo) and typing in the
subject they wish to secure more details about. As an example, once
again referring back to Hong Kong’s and Toronto’s weather patterns, by
typing “Hong Kong Weather” in Google, this will result in a seemingly
countless number of sites to provide adequate information to compare or
contrast these two cities. Once the appropriate information has been
found, learners should be encouraged to make notes of the facts for use
in their drafts. In addition, writers should be encouraged to document
all pertinent information (author’s name, date retrieved, URL address)
because the Internet is so fluid, often times we are no longer able to
revisit a particular site if there is a need for additional
information.
Learner Collaboration
This next topic is very exciting for both educators and learners as we
witness the results of integrating learner collaboration and modern
technology in the second language writing class. The first step is to
divide a class into teams of an equal number of students; ideally three
members per team if possible. With the class divided up, each team is
given a number between 1 and 10 and paired up with another team.
Next, an instructor assigns each team a major world city for which they
are responsible for collecting information to complete their academic
essay. Recently, for example, a class was allocated a mix of cities
from different countries including the following: New York, Bangkok,
Beijing, Toronto, Paris, Rome, Moscow, Tokyo, Rio de Janeiro, and
Vancouver. From this selection of diverse locations, it can be seen
that depending upon what metropolitan areas are matched up for this
task, there can be either a wide or narrow range of differences or
similarities. For example, my class was quite surprised when there
appeared to be a great number of similarities, and few differences,
between the weather conditions of Paris, France, and Moscow, Russia.
Now, the paired up teams will collaborate to decide what three points
they will include to write about in their essays. The decision to
stipulate three points for discussion is based upon the fact that each
team member will be an ‘expert’ for one of the points so as to insure
all members will contribute equally to the final product. Although the
teams are left to negotiate what topics they wish to cover in their
essays; an instructor may intervene with alternative suggestions if the
groups’ decisions are not deemed suitable. As a result of team
negotiation, there has been a wide variety of
interesting topics selected: historical (when the city was founded and
by whom), architectural (classification and description of different
styles), political (type and characteristics), and meteorological
(temperature and precipitation).
Once the topics have been decided upon, each group member independently
searches the Internet for the required information. Having found the
pertinent information and written their information into a paragraph or
two, it is suggested that each member of the team completes a peer
review exercise to insure proper structure of the work submitted. This
exercise usually focuses upon global issues which concern ideas and
organization, although there is the potential for local errors to be
discussed too. As well, I suggest that they use an invention
strategy, listing, to be sure that all the information to be discussed
is included, and this procedure also helps to organize the new essay
from the parts contributed by each team member. Having completed these
steps, each three member group synthesizes their materials to make an
organized essay.
At this point in this task, the groups that were initially assigned to
work together e-mailed their finished product to the other team. Once
again, after the information from the other team has been received,
each team will use listing in order to easily organize their new essay.
Having checked and organized all the information, each team is
responsible for writing a single, coherent, well-organized essay that
compares and contrasts three features of two major cities. Finally, the
completed essays are submitted for grading. However, there are also
alternative methods for presentation of the classes’ work; in the past
a class has made a poster presentation, and another has delivered their
essays through a Power Point presentation.
Conclusion
Although writing in a foreign language can be a daunting experience for
second language students, learner collaboration, in conjunction with
access to the Internet, provides unique opportunities to aid in
developing writing skills. Furthermore, this integrative approach to
genre specific writing also encapsulates the skills that parallel those
that will be essential for our learners to possess outside of the
second language classroom. No doubt, based upon the endless potential
of the Internet, it will continue to have a profound influence upon EFL
instructing and learning in the future.
References
- Brown, H.D. (1991). TESOL at twenty-five: What are the issues?
TESOL Quarterly, 25, 245-260
- Fathman, A., & Kessler, C. (1993). Cooperative language
learning in school contexts. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13
(2), 127-140.
- Graus, J. (1999). The Internet in the EFL classroom: An
evaluation of the usefulness on the Internet in the EFL classroom.
Retrieved March 8, 2004, from the World Wide Web: jgraus@plex.nl
- Greenfield, R. (2003). Collaborative e-mail exchange for teaching
secondary ESL: A case study in Hong Kong. Language Learning and
Technology, 7(1), 46-70.
- Long, M., & Porter, P. (1985). Group work, interlangauge
talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19 (2), 207-228.
- Hauck, M., & Haezewindt, B. (1999). Adding a new perspective
to distance (language) learning: The tutor’s approach. ReCall, 11(2),
46-54.
- Kern, R.G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with
networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of
language production. Modern Language Journal, 79 (4), 457-476.
- Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1994). Using collaborative language
production tasks to promote students’ language awareness. Language
Awareness, 3 (2), 73-93.
- McGroarty, M. (1989). The benefits of cooperative learning
arrangements in second language instruction. The Journal for the
National Association for Bilingual Education, 13 (2), 127-143.
- Osuna, M.M. & Meskill, C. (1998). Using the Wide World Web to
integrate Spanish language and culture: A pilot study. Language
Learning and Technology 1(2), 71-92.
- Warschaur, M. & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language
learning: Theory and practice. Language Teaching, 31, 51-71.
The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. X, No. 10, October 2004
http://iteslj.org/
http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Kenworth-WritingSkills.html