The Internet
TESLJournal
Content-based Instruction in the EFL Literature Curriculum
Hui-fang Shang
hshang {{at}} isu.edu.tw
I-Shou University
(Kaohsiung, Taiwan)
The purpose of this paper is to familiarize EFL instructors with the
effectiveness of using literature in the content-based foreign language
instruction. By applying the collaborative content-based literature
teaching technique, students can acquire English abilities, not only to
communicate, but also to use as a tool to comprehend the subject
matter in school. Because the course of literature emphasizes the
exploration of themes more than other courses, students can learn more
about how to express their ideas through language.
Introduction
When EFL students enter the university, due to the lack of English
language ability and the use of the immersion education in school, they
often encounter a lot of frustrations. As a result, many researchers
and scholars try to apply various teaching methods not only to increase
students' language ability, but also to help them comprehend the
academic subject matter in school. One of the most popular methods is
content-based language instruction. This teaching method can
simultaneously help learners use the foreign language to express their
thoughts in different situations, and further use it as a tool to
comprehend the subject matter in school. Because the course of
literature emphasizes the exploration of themes more than other
courses, students can learn more about how to express their thoughts
through language. It is hoped that this newly designed literature
curriculum can simultaneously increase students' knowledge of a content
area, as well as enhance their critical thinking ability and English
fluency.
To understand thoroughly the basic concept of content-based
instruction, the rationale of content-based instruction and benefits of
collaborating content-based instruction and literature teaching are
discussed in the following section. Finally, the new collaborative
literature curriculum, including course objectives, class activities,
and assessment is designed and discussed.
What Is Content-Based Instruction?
Content-based instruction (CBI) is "the integration of a particular
content [e.g., math, science, social studies] with second language aims
…. It refers to the concurrent teaching of academic subject matter and
second language skills" (Brinton et al, 1989, p. 2). According to
Krashen (1982), in content-based instruction, students can acquire the
content area of the subject matter with comprehensible input, and
simultaneously increase their language skills. To achieve the goal of
language skills improvement, Krashen states that the focus of the
teaching is on the authentic and meaningful input, not on the
grammatical form.
There are two types of models in the content-based instruction. The
first type is a theme-based model in which selected topics or themes
provide the content for students to learn (Brinton et al, 1989). From
these topics, EFL teachers should extract language activities which
follow naturally from the content material. For example, teachers can
select the topic of "advertising" and have students engage in a variety
of activities, such as designing and administering a marketing survey,
comparing and contrasting consumer attitudes, etc. Under such
circumstances, students would be more familiar with the content and the
meaning of the topic. Krashen and Terrell (1998) suggest that EFL
teachers must choose reading texts at an appropriate level of
complexity and the topic has to hold students’ interest to increase
their motivation for learning.
The other type of the content-based approach, which is also the
focus of this paper, is the adjunct model. This model rather emphasizes
the importance of concurrently teaching the academic subject matter and
foreign language skills (Brinton et al, 1989). EFL teachers have to
design various teaching activities that combine four modes (i.e.,
speaking, listening, reading, and writing) in order to enhance
students' literacy, oral development, and thinking skills positively.
To achieve the enhancement, Krashen (1985) advocates that using one
extended text, such as a novel or a short story, can help students
develop familiarity with a particular literacy style and later
unknowingly promote their literacy development. To guarantee successful
reading, Taguchi et al (2004) suggest that schemata play an important
role in constructing meaning from text. As a result, reading
instructors need to relate to the EFL students’ background knowledge
for better reading performance (Inoue, 1998). Lin (2004) also proves
that through reading stories, students not only get involved when they
are reading, but also link their personal experiences to the contents,
which are positive to their reading development.
In short, CBI employs English at a comprehensible level so as to
increase students' understanding of the subject matter and build
language skills simultaneously. In addition, research (Custodio &
Sutton, 1998) has shown that CBI often uses authentic tasks centered
around authentic materials, so it can help language minority students
increase their motivation, and provide more opportunities for them to
explore prior knowledge. Therefore, the use of the CBI can be effective
in the EFL classroom.
Why Use Literature?
Writing about the use of literature with EFL students, Langer (1997)
states, "because it taps what they know and who they are, literature is
a particularly inviting context for learning both a second/foreign
language and literacy" (p. 607). According to Langer, literature allows
students to reflect on their lives, learning, and language. Literature
can open "horizons of possibility, allowing students to question,
interpret, connect, and explore" (p. 607).
In addition to open horizons of possibility for students to explore,
Goodman (1986) and Smith (1971) state that language is not learned from
the part to the whole, but from the whole to the part, and all language
functions interrelate. In other words, students have to learn the
foreign language in a holistic process in order to increase their
language ability. As a result, FL teachers must simultaneously apply
teaching activities that tend to combine the four modes so as to
enhance both literacy and oral development. According to Fitzgerald
(1993), literature can be the vehicle to improve students' overall
language skills. It can "expose students to a wide variety of styles
and genres" (p. 643). It is in literature that "the resources of the
language are most fully and skillfully used" (Sage, 1987, p. 6).
Indeed, EFL teachers should use the best literature available as a
model of masterful language usage. In other words, language and
literature can not be separated. Teaching language in isolation from
literature will not move students toward mastery of the four language
skills (Abulhaija, 1987).
Benefits of Collaborating Content-Based Instruction and Literature
Teaching
To effectively teach academic subject matter and foreign language
skills, EFL teachers should collaborate content-based instruction and
literature study. Brinton et al (1989) list several benefits of
collaborating CBI and literature teaching. For example, students can
gain knowledge of vocabulary, grammar, and paragraph structure,
interactive communication skills, and types and styles of writing.
Besides, according to Custodio and Sutton (1998), literature is a
valuable language tool (with authentic texts), so it can help language
minority students increase their motivation, explore prior knowledge,
and promote literacy development. Abulhaija (1987) further supports
that language and literature can not be separated because each has
something important to offer in the development of a well-rounded
student. Literature teaches idiomatic language and cultural context; it
can also improve reading and comprehension skills, promote correctness
in speech and writing, and encourage students to read for enjoyment. In
addition, Erkaya (2005) states that by integrating literature in the
curricula, students can learn the four skills – listening, speaking,
reading, and writing – more effectively because of the literary,
cultural, higher-order thinking, and motivational benefits. To achieve
these benefits, EFL instructors should design the collaborative
content-based literature class carefully to meet the needs of their
students.
Curriculum Design of the Collaboration
Course Objectives
The focus of literature teaching is not only to help students
comprehend the meaning that the author tries to express, but also to
enhance students' thinking and language abilities, as well as study
skills. Students have to learn vocabulary, discover questions, evaluate
evidence individually and in group discussions, form judgments based on
synthesis and analysis, and develop a coherent argument in support of a
position.
The objectives for this course include the following:
- Build on students' educational background and personal
experiences based on the topic of the literature
- Help students comprehend the meaning that the author tries to
convey in order to enhance their reading ability
- Provide the opportunities for peer cooperative learning
- Enhance students' critical thinking and judgmental abilities
- Develop students' aural/oral fluency by asking questions and
sharing their feedback
- Develop students' writing ability by writing an essay or comments
related to the topic of the literature
Class Activities
The focus of the class activities should be to elicit knowledge of
content,
acquisition of thinking skills, and development of English language
abilities. The novels or short stories containing specific topics
should involve consideration of the cultures, reading levels, and
interests of the students. For example, we can select a historical
fiction, with the topic of "immigration". The class activities include
the following:
- Build background knowledge: Before
reading the novel, teachers
can ask students general questions related to the content, in order to
have a schematic understanding. For example, we can ask students
whether they have friends or relatives who have immigrated, or the
reasons for immigration, etc.
- Teach new vocabulary:
Before reading the text, we should ask
students to make associations among key words, like "immigration". In
another exercise, students can guess the meaning of words from context,
using the dictionary if necessary.
- Arouse learning motivation and
interest: Before reading the
novel, we can ask students to watch the film or the video tape.
Students can discuss the content of the film to have a basic
understanding of the content.
- Enhance four modes and critical
thinking abilities: After reading
the novel, students can discuss the meaning that the author expresses,
share their feedback, or make a comparison with their own lives and
experiences. Through the interactive group discussion, students can
develop their language fluency and critical thinking abilities. In
addition, by wiring comments or abstract, students can develop their
writing ability.
- Promote cooperative learning: Students
would be divided into
groups. Each group has to go to the library and find the resources
related to the topic of the novel. They then make a report to the other
groups. By cooperative learning, students can not only make use of the
resources from the library, but also gain more knowledge from the peers.
Assessment
We can use a variety of instruments to assess students' English and
content learning. For example, we can use a written test, such as true
or false, multiple choices, essay questions, etc. to test students'
reading comprehension. We may also ask students to write down an essay
to evaluate students' writing ability. Besides, we can design a game,
similar to a very popular American TV show (Jeopardy). Basically,
students would be asked questions which are related to the content of
the novel. Through such kind of game, teachers can evaluate students'
aural/oral ability, as well as their vocabulary and reading
comprehension.
Conclusion
According to Sagliano and Greenfield (1998), the use of the
collaborative content-based literature teaching can improve EFL
students' motivation and comprehension. The teaching of literature
subject is compatible with a focus on the development of English
fluency precisely because by discussing the issues presented in the
novels or short stories, students can convey their thoughts through
language, promote higher level thinking skills, and use language
authentically. Meanwhile, literature provides a window into western
cultures, helping students understand how foreigners live and think.
Literature in deed helps students to expand their "linguistic and
cognitive skills, cultural knowledge and sensitivity (quoted in
Shanahan, 1997, p. 165)". Consequently, one can say that this
collaborative CBI with literature teaching can promote simultaneous
learning of academic content, cultures, English language skills, and
critical thinking abilities.
References
- Abulhaija, L. A. (1987). English language and literature in EFL
situations. Retrieved July 12, 2006, from the ERIC database.
- Brinton, D., Snow, M., & Wesche, M. (1989). Content-based
second language instruction. New York: Newbury House.
- Custodio, B., & Sutton, M. J. (1998). Literature-based ESL
for secondary school students. TESOL Journal, 7(5), 19-23.
- Erkaya, O. R. (2005). Benefits of using short stories in the EFL
Context. Asian EFL Journal, 8, 1-13.
- Fitzgerald, J. (1993). Literacy and students who are learning
English as a second language. The Reading Teacher, 46(8), 638-647.
- Goodman, K. (1986). What's whole in whole language? Portsmouth,
NH: Heinemann.
- Inoue, Y. (1998). Reading and the ESL student. Retrieved March
20, 2006, from the ERIC database.
- Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practices of second
language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
- Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and
implications. New York: Longman.
- Krashen, S. D. & Terrell, T. D. (1998). The natural approach:
Language acquisition in the classroom. New York: Prentice Hall
International.
- Langer, J. (1997). Literacy acquisition through literature.
Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 40, 602-614.
- Lin, W. S. (2004). The theory and practice of “literature group”.
Journal of Education Research, 126, 33-44.
- Sage, H. (1987). Incorporating literature into ESL instruction.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Sagliano, M., & Greenfield, K. (1998). A collaborative model
of content-based EFL instruction in the liberal arts. TESOL Journal,
7(3), 23-28.
- Shanahan, D. (1997). Articulating the relationship between
language, literature, and culture: Toward a new agenda for foreign
language teaching and research. The Modern Language Journal, 81,
164-174.
- Smith, F. (1971). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic
analysis of reading and learning to read. New York: Holt, Rinehart
& Winston.
- Taguchi, E., Takayasu-Maass, M., & Gorsuch, G. J. (2004).
Developing reading fluency in EFL: How assisted repeated reading and
extensive reading affect fluency development. Reading in a Foreign
Language, 16(2), 70-96.
The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. XII, No. 11, November 2006
http://iteslj.org/
http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Shang-CBI.html